In Robert 
                Brill’s splendid fairground set, the first thing that comes 
                into view above a steel-pier scaffolding is a neon sign flashing 
                “shoot! win!” Only four of the nine would-be Presidential 
                assassins whom the show throws together actually got their man; 
                the others form a sort of demented gang who just can’t shoot 
                straight. Nonetheless, the homicidal itch in all of them was inspired 
                by what Thorstein Veblen called “invidious comparison”—that 
                particularly American brand of envy which agitates citizens to 
                achieve and acquire, and perversely propels the deranged to spoil 
                or to steal the power they conspicuously lack. “If you can’t 
                do what you want to,” Sondheim’s gang sings, “you 
                do the things you can.”
              “Murder 
                is negative creation,” Auden said. For this musical’s 
                marginalized souls, taking aim at a President is the magical solution 
                that can impose coherence on a wrecked life. In the first song, 
                the straw-hatted fun-house proprietor (the excellent Marc Kudisch), 
                who hands out guns to the malefactors as he introduces them to 
                us, portrays them all as frustrated American dreamers: “No 
                job? Cupboard bare? / One room, no one there? / Hey, pal, don’t 
                despair— / You wanna shoot a President?” The assassins 
                all have grandiose plans to claim, if not maim, the public imagination. 
                “I have given up my life for one act, you understand,” 
                John Wilkes Booth (Michael Cerveris) says to his accomplice. Booth 
                feels betrayed by history and by the violence of the Civil War. 
                Abandoned by destiny, he becomes it; he kills in order to heal. 
                In his apocalyptic act, he controls history, death, even his own 
                immortality. Later, in a debate with Lee Harvey Oswald (Neil Patrick 
                Harris), Booth expounds on the idea of infamy. “They’ll 
                hate you with a passion,” he says. “Imagine people 
                having passionate feelings about Lee Harvey Oswald.” Likewise, 
                Sam Byck (Mario Cantone), who is hellbent on flying a plane into 
                the White House to kill Nixon—and who, incidentally, is 
                dressed as Santa Claus—sees his act as holy and purifying. 
                “You know the world’s a vicious, stinking pit of emptiness 
                and pain,” he says on a tape that he makes to send to Leonard 
                Bernstein. “I’m gonna change things.” (Byck 
                was shot dead before he could accomplish his plan, but not before 
                he’d killed two people.)
              In the case 
                of John Hinckley (Alexander Gemignani), who shot Ronald Reagan 
                to win favor with Jodie Foster, history provides better lines 
                than Weidman and Sondheim’s caricature. Hinckley understood 
                that prestige is awarded on evidence; he also understood that 
                in the aristocracy of American success there are no strangers. 
                Shooting Reagan made him Foster’s equal in celebrity—an 
                equality that, in Hinckley’s eyes, could make intimacy possible. 
                Although Weidman has Hinckley referring to the shooting as a “historic 
                act,” he misses the more piquant point that for the real 
                Hinckley the assassination was a first step into show business. 
                The shooting, Hinckley told his psychiatrists, was “a movie 
                starring me,” with Reagan as co-star and “a cast of 
                doctors, lawyers, and hangers-on.”
              Only in the 
                cakewalk to the gallows of President Garfield’s killer, 
                Charles Guiteau (the compelling Denis O’Hare), does “Assassins” 
                intimate the bright and deadly righteousness of the terrorist’s 
                mentality. “I was just acting / For Someone up there. / 
                The Lord’s my employer / And now he’s my lawyer, / 
                So do what you dare,” Guiteau sings, in the song that best 
                shows off Sondheim’s dramatic expertise. 
              Although Sondheim 
                began his career, in the late fifties, peddling optimism (“Something’s 
                coming, something good / If I can wait”), by the seventies 
                he was selling the new pessimism: “Every day a little death 
                . . . / Every day a little sting / In the heart and in the head.” 
                To sing about the dark heart, instead of the big heart, became 
                his musical mission, a newfound nihilism that proved to be a mother 
                lode. From the poisoned well of hate, revenge, envy, and disappointment, 
                Sondheim drew the pure water of lyric feeling. His musicals abound 
                with emotional terrorists (the overbearing Momma Rose, in “Gypsy”; 
                the hysterical Fosca, in “Passion”) and with killings 
                (“Pacific Overtures”; “Into the Woods”). 
                His masterpiece, “Sweeney Todd,” tells the story of 
                a serial killer. Sondheim spoke to the disenchantment of the times, 
                and his approach turned him not so much into a celebrity as a 
                theology. “Is Stephen Sondheim God?” New York asked 
                in one headline. That’s sort of how the young playwright 
                Charles Gilbert felt—he’d written a script called 
                “Assassins”—when Sondheim contacted him about 
                using his idea. “I was pretty cheeky—I offered to 
                work on it with him—it was like writing a letter to God,” 
                Gilbert told Sondheim’s biographer Meryle Secrest. To a 
                man of Sondheim’s ambition and sourness, the doleful, contrarian 
                subject matter was irresistible. 
              This dark 
                cartoon—a kind of glib carnival of carnage—was first 
                performed in 1991, at the beginning of the Gulf War. It was meant 
                to have its Broadway début just after September 11, 2001. 
                The delay of more than two years has not helped the show’s 
                karma or its message. The musical views terrorism as the random 
                acts of individual madmen, not as the coördinated civil mayhem 
                we now know. In its heavy-handed exposition, the show reminds 
                us that “every now and then / A madman’s / Bound to 
                come along. / Doesn’t stop the story— . . . / Doesn’t 
                change the song.” Well, yes, it does. The jihadists of September 
                11th imprinted their sense of death irrevocably on this nation. 
                In one way or another, we are all now survivors. “Assassins”’s 
                portrait of American invincibility has come to feel almost as 
                Pollyannaish as the traditional musicals against which Sondheim’s 
                work rebels. In a new song, “Something Just Broke,” 
                Sondheim acknowledges the survivor’s psychic numbness—“Something 
                just spoke / Something I wish I hadn’t heard / Something 
                bewildering occurred”—but he’s unable to move 
                from generalization to penetration. In light of our new hell, 
                the violence that “Assassins” addresses seems antique, 
                quaint, almost sweet: Terrorism Lite. 
              Although “Assassins” 
                may not think deeply, it does at least think out of the box, which 
                is itself an achievement. It is well sung, gorgeous to look at, 
                and meticulous in its detail. Still, it has been freighted with 
                more weight than it can properly carry. It promises a journey 
                into the psychopathic interior, but it remains resolutely on the 
                outskirts. “The show will live on,” André Bishop 
                wrote in his introduction to the 1991 version. I respectfully 
                beg to differ. Despite the boldness of its surface, “Assassins” 
                is more semaphore than metaphor.