MUSICAL MAYHEM'S THE MAIN EVENT
The New York Post
By Michael Riedel
April 23, 2004
READY, aim, fire!
In the battle for Tony Awards, "Assassins" is poised
to murder its rivals.
Produced by
the Roundabout Theater Company, Stephen Sondheim and John Weidman's
controversial musical about presidential assassins opened last
night at Studio 54 - and for the most part, the reviews today
are raves.
The worst-kept
secret in the theater industry was Ben Brantley's review in The
New York Times. Yesterday, you'd have been hard-pressed to find
a stage doorman who hadn't heard it was terrific.
New York Times
Arts and Leisure columnist Frank Rich is also said to be writing
a rave. He panned the show when it debuted off-Broadway in December
1990, but is now expected to say he was wrong and that "Assassins"
was ahead of its time.
The Post's
Clive Barnes was cool to the show (see his review, facing page),
but most of the other notices today are just about the best any
musical has received this season.
With this
kind of momentum behind it, "Assassins" will surely
pick up plenty of Tony nominations next month.
But is it
a new musical, or - because it had a brief run 13 years ago at
Playwrights Horizons - is it a revival?
The answer
to that question all depends on how 24 theater insiders, who sit
on the Tony Awards administration committee, interpret a vaguely
worded eligibility requirement.
Any show that
has already appeared on Broadway is automatically considered a
revival.
Where things
get sticky is with a show like "Assassins," which has
been around a long time, but has never been on Broadway.
A few years
ago, the Tonys made a rule that any show that has not run on Broadway
but is "in the historical or popular repertory may not be
eligible for an award in the Best Play or Best Musical category."
Thus, "Little
Shop of Horrors," which ran off-Broadway in the 1980s and
has been produced thousands of times around the country, is considered
a revival.
But "Assassins"?
Its original
off-Broadway run was only a couple of months, and, because of
its creepy subject matter, it has hardly been a staple of the
"repertory," with only some 200 stock and amateur productions
in the last 13 years.
Yesterday,
several members of the Tony administration committee - which will
make its decision May 6 - said the issue was very much up in the
air.
"It could
go either way," said one. "Personally, I think it's
a revival."
But another
said, "I don't think you can make the case that it is in
the 'popular repertory.' It hasn't been done that many times.
I'd vote for it as a new musical."
Another member
who thinks "Assassins" should be a new show said, "It
troubles me to say it was a revival. It was geared to go to Broadway
originally, but it never got its shot."
A fourth member
of the committee, who puts himself down as undecided, said, "It's
going to be a battle. It's going to be wild in there."
The fortunes
not only of "Assassins" but of the season's other musicals
hang on the committee's decision.
If "Assassins"
is ruled a revival, it is almost certain to snatch the award from
"Wonderful Town," which is limping at the box office
and will be sunk if it doesn't win.
But if "Assassins"
is deemed a new musical, it will elbow "Bombay Dreams"
and "The Boy From Oz" out of the field of nominees -
which, in addition to "Assassins," will surely be made
up of "Wicked," "Caroline, or Change" and
"Avenue Q."
Sondheim will
be eligible for his score, and will probably win.
Weidman's
book will be nominated, and he, too, will have a very good chance
of winning.
The casualty
here will be "Avenue Q," which is counting on winning
some writing awards. It could be shut out of the Tonys completely.
Should "Assassins"
find itself in the Best Musical category, its main rival will
be "Wicked," the biggest commercial hit of the season.
This will
play out as an art ("Assassins") vs. commerce ("Wicked")
battle.
Normally,
I'd bet on commerce.
But because
there is so much reverence for Sondheim in this industry - and
lingering sadness over the recent failure of his musical "Bounce"
- the old man might carry the day.
Whatever happens,
a Tony Award race that once looked like a big bore has suddenly
gotten mighty interesting.
Back
to Articles
|